LoopdMed gives medical and pre-med students one place to capture missed questions, preserve the reason they missed them, and turn each mistake into reviewable knowledge.
Capture screenshots or text from practice blocks.
Tag each miss by exam, subject, system, and error reason.
Keep missed questions connected to follow-up review.
Four seamless steps designed to sit right beside your daily practice blocks.
Snap or paste the question you missed from UWorld, AAMC, Amboss, or class exams. Drop it straight in.
Categorize why you missed it (Misread Stem, Logic Flaw, or Content Gap) and tag the topic or organ system.
Distill the explanation into a single, high-yield takeaway rule that solves future question variations.
FSRS-powered scheduling brings the rule back through active recall, adapting future timing as your review history grows.
Most QBank review breaks down because the original miss gets buried in screenshots, notebooks, or spreadsheets. LoopdMed keeps the question, source, topic, and context together from the start.
A mistake log is only useful when it shows patterns. LoopdMed makes each entry part of a review system so you can see whether misses come from content gaps, logic mistakes, or stem-reading errors.
A correct answer is not always a mastered concept. If you guessed, changed your answer without a clear reason, or could not explain why the distractors were wrong, the question still belongs in your review system.
The best missed-question log is the one you will still use after a difficult practice block. Preserve the minimum context needed to understand the mistake, then write one testable rule for the next encounter.
Use the same short sequence after each practice block. Consistency makes the log searchable, reviewable, and useful across weeks of preparation.
Add a permitted screenshot or your own short summary, then record the QBank, exam section, topic, and question reference.
Tag the main reason for the miss: a content gap, a logic flaw, or a misread stem. Add one sentence describing what happened.
Reduce the explanation to the principle that would help on a different question. Avoid copying an entire rationale into your notes.
Turn the takeaway into an active-recall prompt and let the review queue bring it back after the original question is no longer fresh.
This original example shows the level of detail to preserve. It is intentionally short: enough to recover the reasoning error without rereading a full explanation.
The entry preserves the reasoning failure and produces a reusable rule. It does not depend on memorizing the wording of the original question.
At minimum, record the source, section or subject, topic, why your answer looked right, the main error type, and one rule that would prevent the same mistake. A question number by itself is rarely enough to reconstruct your reasoning weeks later.
Log misses that reveal a reusable content or reasoning lesson. You can skip clerical mistakes with no useful pattern, but include uncertain correct answers and lucky guesses because they often reveal knowledge that is not stable yet.
Aim for a short, repeatable entry rather than a rewritten explanation. The goal is to preserve the cause of the miss and create a testable takeaway without turning post-block review into another full study session.
No. LoopdMed is a post-question review and retention layer. Continue using your QBank for practice questions and explanations, then use LoopdMed to organize personal mistakes and review the lessons that came from them.
Only add material you are permitted to use and follow the terms of your QBank or course provider. A short personal summary of the question and your reasoning is often enough to create a useful review item.
